Friday, March 11, 2011

The Absolute Truth

The Absolute Truth

In this article how to improve my condition for you and other citizens futuristic suppressed violate our civil liberties and our constitutional rights known as the Bill of Rights mentioned can be applied to the suspension of finding out who are 10 amendments to the Constitution of the U.S. expects more AMMENDMENTS.

As a soldier for twenty years in the U.S. Army as a soldier working in civil law and five years and after serving a police officer.

We are or in my case was (past tense) to the United States of America, for the formation of life and protecting the rights of others sworn to serve and protect its citizens. A small majority of us and our modern terminology is called Patriot Day "promise keepers."

Department of Homeland Security Admiministration us "terrorists" or "right wing" extremists, such as the label as a majority of us against the government-run health legislation will appear.

Introduction of the involvement of government:

This reform effort is an obvious and clear goal as President and his government and people of the United States of America on a New World Order or one world government public servant.

Or their own business interests, scientists made with appointed consultants, elected leaders, representatives of informal shadow bill unconstitutional for the government of the creation of a new piece of legislation will be the initiation effect and wordage.

I modified:

Congress has no religion, or prohibiting the free exercise to establish law and freedom of speech, shorten, or pressure, or the right of people to peacefully assemble, and to the Government for the redress of grievances.

Amendment 1 has been eroded and is forced to evaporate. Himself a citizen of this country suspected criminal / panic to find someone to speak out against politicians and elitists can fly lists. You speak in public, informal conversations and Internet search engine, entries may be a radical personal and political blogs on the label.

Care of their religious and political beliefs. You may be accused of blasphemy against the state or states that a panic-monger to be anti-gay, fear seller, a liar, a potential terrorist anti-conformist, criminal elements, poor, and many other labels that their political rivals, the functions as described or money in their quest for power and their existence may be jeopardized.

Wealth and power of the lobby gains early construction of the new health reform and the new universal health care support services, pharmaceuticals, power supplies.

First Amendment, ask yourself: Where the country gather together in peace and a police presence or a partisan attack or a label you a list of concerns Homeland Security Administration, with no media and allowed to give their opinion? Have you noticed that the local microphone to talk to the representative town hall meetings is protected by third party? (While the fourth person) for a finger to the person making the request of the third person to turn off the microphone does not seem to keep.

The many public meetings and town hall meetings for the purpose of selection questions were screened. I have someone who disagrees that we can not control the police to the kingdom you tube internet website and see what the health of the town hall meetings, the challenge to enter.

Absolute Truth

Absolute Truth

I don't consider myself a wise or gifted individual in either reason or logic but this post is my attempt at reason and logic. This is a little brain exerciser in order to get you thinking...

There was an issue that came up in my English class, the middle of my junior year at high school concerning whether or not there was an absolute truth.

I believed there was, everyone else did not. Greatly outnumbered in both volume and energy, I was unable to clearly display my point.

This is my attempt to persuade you, my audience, that there is such a category of truths.


Take, for example, a glass of water filled till water takes up exactly half of the volume of the cup. Since this very cup is already famous for it optimist/pessimistic test, I thought it apt for my own analysis. A person, on looking at the aforementioned glass may say,

“That is half full,” while another might glance at the same glass and announce, “That is half full,”. Is either wrong? One may be more cheery than the other but neither is incorrect in their proclamation. Both of these proclamations are truths but they conflict even though they say the same thing. So what is it than, is their one absolute truth for both views?

Obviously, in this scenario, there is: “Water is occupying exactly half of the glass.” This one statement, this one truth, is absolute and unarguable. Unfortunately my English class did not agree. So I persist in arguing my point to you. Please comment below on your opinion and explain it. Thank you